His mental illness caused him to destroy large amounts of equipment resulting in his eventual demotion. In the context of the model, this is a rules-based behavior: An OCD sufferer very often has all their belongings in specific places at home and work, and any changes to their location is a violation of their personal rules. OCD activities may resemble or accompany bipolar and aspergers activities in that OCD sufferers cannot feel or conceive of the effects of their actions; often their actions are at the expense of others. Drug addiction is obsessive; heroin addicts go through "cold turkey" withdrawal usually several times a week, yet return to heroin after the withdrawal symptoms have passed.
There is something that drives them to addiction, and it is obsessive. It is as if there is a "hole" that needs to be filled to provide a sense of well-being; a need has to be fulfilled. The effects of the extreme drugs, which are usually anti-empathic, are preceded by a need, that is likewise anti-empathic.
These needs may be fulfilled in other ways than drugs: They may be compounded by other odd conditions, such as the attraction to random reinforcement such as found in gambling. The control factor as part of resource exploitation raises control itself to level of a comforting activity; but only comforting for the controller; the controlled are being exploited, of course. A paradox of earning a living is often, if not usually, a reliance on these obsessive drives in others: The history of capital is so founded in these drives that only those with these conditions can lead the pursuit of resources making all others who follow them, those who provide them with the supporting collaboration to create resources, subject to their mapping.
This one is a surprise, but was so compelling it could not be ignored. Two associates of mine, one on Wall Street and the other an on-line magazine editor have both admitted to ADD, and both are so uniquely narcissistic that I view them as virtually the same person. Both have a hunger to succeed that is both enviable yet seemingly self-defeating. Both fit Beck's model of organizers that resist "real" information, information that would cause them to change their courses of action. Neither are what I would call bad people, but both are marginally dishonest, and unquestionably use the "rules" to their personal benefits.
Specifically one has a tendency to completely infuriate and demoralize with endless minor lies, and then say "get over it," and then justify his actions with a paycheck, and the other seems to have those tendencies as well according to other people who have worked with him. While I find it hard to define their issues as having to do this attention deficit, they are self-admitted ADD sufferers, and fit this model as anti-empathic so cleanly that their self-descriptions cannot be ignored.
It is possible to think of a thinking disorder in terms of misconception; someone suffering from a thinking disorder has such a misconceived conception that they are unable to function normally. Usually this is caused by something like hallucinations. But if you can think of thinking disorder purely in terms of misconceptions that may be caused by any disease, then a lack of understanding of how others feel about ones actions, especially if they are hurtful as many capital actions are and show an inability to conceive of the long-term effects of those actions, then they can be thought of as thinking disorders.
Thinking disorders can then be thought of as misconceived thoughts resulting from an inability to understand the effects that one is having, even if the sufferer does not show typical thinking order symptoms that are seen in psychotics and schizophrenics. What is missing then is an ability to feel one's effects on others which is one of the two descriptions of disease in the model , and an inability to see their long-term effects which is the other of the two descriptions.
Bipolar disorder can resemble psychosis and they respond to similar medications such as Abilify , whereas asperger's sufferers usually appear to be in control of their actions unless they suffer from another disorder or want you to think they do. Their part-time disconnection then appears to be more damaging to the their sense of control than the full-time disconnection does for aspergers sufferers. From this perspective of the model, this may result from the bipolar sufferer's inability to control the cycles between emotional connection and isolation.
People interrelate into their community by constructing knowledge. That knowledge is connective and largely shared, and it makes life meaningful. Social disruption causes hardship; without the social context there loneliness and desperation. Communities that have been disrupted often remain physically, even though the people of the community have been displaced, or eradicated.
With the elimination of local peoples is the erasure of the community of knowledge. The natural context is replaced with a governance structure, where what remains of the original culture lives desperately under repression. An information facade of synthetic emotional and societal constructs usually replaces the natural community of knowledge in the modern real estate development model.
Often fictional representations of locally destroyed communities are represented to entertain those who have replaced them. As the quality of life decays, especially at the end of life, modern synthesis, especially medicine, is used to rationalize the social fracturing, by prolonging life through chemistry as in the case of medicine. As natural nurturing disappears so does the fundamental meaning of life, and with it the quality of life.
Every emotional component of the original and natural community of knowledge disappears, except those that can easily be exploited. Historical structures are destroyed, though examples of culture may be preserved in museums. With the disconnection from the environment, local humans loose their natural connection to their historical and evolutionary pasts. The very first step in the annexation of resources by invading outsiders is always the destruction of this connection. The psychological layer of this erasure model challenges the empathy model because emotionally connecting constructs are missing: Uncomfortable components are introduced: Some strong people turn inwards meditatively.
The anti-empathic adapt virally and act through predatory cooperation. Those who have been displaced, or worse, may rebel violently; they are labeled violent and punished, or worse, by the most violent, the capital annexers. Meanings are reversed; the formerly invading outsiders become the genteel insiders, the former insiders become marginalized, and are forced to emulate the former outsiders.
Neural damage from the continual stress of societal erasure cannot be good; there cannot be any benefit from it despite the adage "what does not kill us makes us stronger. To relive the pain of trauma drugs are used, and as it happens cocaine instantly relives the pain of the panic disorder suffered by those victimized with trauma, yet cocaine also destroys empathic neuron functionality, adding in recent years to the ironic aspects of the lives of the displaced whose communities of knowledge have been erased.
In the case of criminals, the money they receive gives them unlimited access to the drugs that enable their crime by destroying their empathic neurons. The destructive effect becomes recursive; they can through drug use and toxic mapping extend the destruction into the environment around them, with the support of others doing the same activity. With the destruction of their empathy, they achieve what they perceive as a freedom from empathy through the destruction of their emotional communication facilities to allow them to continue, or increase, their heinous activity.
On the political layer, this of freedom is type of freedom that allows for the hurting of others, presumably to obtain resources IF Stone, and others. This is a big "to do" that I neglected on the recent pass; every organism lives for resources.
- Page not available!
- Freuds Foes: Psychoanalysis, Science, and Resistance (Polemics)?
- The Boys of Wasioja.
- Halfhyde to the Narrows (The Halfhyde Adventures).
- Evolution and Empathy.
What corporations mean by "human resources" is not, as I originally thought, the development of the resources of its employees, but the exploitation of humans specifically as resource, and not an asset. Emotionally communicating people collaborate to create resources initially by farming, and then through ingenious development that eventually becomes technology. Digitally communicating people can only work to exploit resources as they lack the neural ability to contribute in a collaborative way.
Cooperation is the digital analogy to collaboration; using rules, they can combine efforts to resources cooperatively. If cooperation ceases to be the path of least resistance of exploitation, the group effort ceases, and the effort becomes "every man for himself. Interestingly the word development is most widely used in conjunction with private or retail property: But real estate development is pure exploitation, both of humanity illegal immigration the environment habitat destruction , and the economy unsustainable consumption through debt without balancing production.
The use of the word development, which is a collaborative process, to mean exploitation demonstrates the viral nature of the digitally communication. How empathic neural constructs are the basis for matrices of interrelated thoughts, which create affection and then extend to create morality.
They also allow for conceptualization which helps us understand the effects of our actions, and hence gives us the ability to be responsible for our them, and also to perceive the effects of present-day conditions far into the future. Serial thought attempts to mimic conceptional constructs by creating complex calculations such as are found in physics examples. The complexity of life is far beyond physics examples; invariably decisions based on serial calculations lead to failure, and in the case of policy making decisions, usually lead to vast disaster measured in cyclic failure.
Society today is serial. One drives down American highways seeing seemingly repeated patterns of the same signs. Underneath the signs are identical copies of stores found under previously seen signs. The people within the stores are allowed minimal, if any, personal identity or expression, and the people visiting these stores expect a homogenized humanity. Most people participating in this serialized culture, which can only be called a system, have adapted to it, and some thrive.
Since the human existence is so abbreviated, then the people who feel comfortable and derive benefits from this system must themselves be limited: It is not surprising that this culture, or system, has created an atmosphere that promotes serial killing. This is a probable cause, if the defects are permanent. Dormant neurons can be reactivated with nurturing.
A genetic explanation is a historical, and probably catalyzing, cause of lost empathy resulting in social disruptions, whose global summation is resulting in a present-day meltdown. It may be that a manipulative person can use mapping, or neuroplasticity, to reduce another person's feelings and thoughts by altering the neural pathways that define empathic constructs. If so, there is no reason that a group of manipulative people cannot disable empathy in groups through such mapping; this may be a key to cult-type control. Psychic mapping, thus described, can be thought of as a low-level or behavioral component of didactic teaching.
Behaviorism is a low layer in the psychic strata; there are no moral, organizational, responsibility components, or even teaching components associated with it, except with respect to social rules, which can be either societal or criminal. Cocaine causes narcissism, what I term an key unempathic disorder Saddam Hussien was said to be malignantly narcissist. This tells me that cocaine is a major cause of un-empapthy, and it is everywhere, most recently Africa.
Unempathic people may have intelligence, but their lack of feeling--usually below that of a normal pet or wild animal--causes them their thinking to suffer. This is why un-empathy is a thinking disorder, as opposed to emotional or traumatic disorder. Included also is methedrine, a more extreme stimulant than cocaine, and possibly much more damaging to empathic neurons. Not included is heroin, which is far less damaging to neurons, and marijuana is especially not included, as it appears to increase sensitivity to others, though that would seem impossible as only DNA and healing improve neurons.
According to research, nurturing is so connected to empathy development that it may actually cause neurons to form; I find this difficult because nurturing does not cause limbs to grow, DNA does. From this I feel it safe to assume that poor or missing nurturing in a childhood may result in unused but still possibly accessible empathic neurons, accessible through therapy.
Mapping is another important environmental effect, and I believe that it usually works against empathy development, that mapping in children has the opposite effect. Mapping in normal society can be extremely detrimental, where a mean person who cannot receive emotional communication, communicates along emotional channels to disrupt an intended victim's normal emotional well-being.bulbouydefiga.ml/war-and-military-action-fiction/the-best-ever-book-of-fulham-jokes.pdf
So much so that those using mapping as a disruptive strategy look for emotional well-being, and hence healthy emotional communication channels to affect an attack. And it always goes back to resources, including the protection of annexed resources as in the example of mapping Goleman gives in Social Intelligence: Nurturing is the cure for effective mapping; consolance by a family member undoes the damage of societies appointed controllers.
I think this may be the last component of the model within its present scope. When is apparent ECD, or anti-empathy, the result of mapping? Goleman in Social Intelligence shows how an experience with a hateful person who is "acting out," results in exceeding frustration. He gives the example of the mean security guard, who in all likely-hood rationalizes, successfully, his ill will as "doing his job.
This is probably best done by relaxing, possibly by stopping at the local bar for a "quick nip. However the bad mapping inflicted by the wrong-doer may persist, especially if the hateful mapping is continually administered. This can be shown easily by looking at the mistreatment of animals, and mistreated animals become exceedingly defensive, or "fearful.
Evolution and Empathy: The Genetic Factor in the Rise of Humanism - ProQuest
This type of mapping is clearly a part of the control strategies of malicious social structures, such as slavery, where pain and fear are used to exploit resources, such as "free" labor. The question becomes "does hateful mapping, especially if it cannot be resisted, cause the person, or organism, being mapped to become hateful himself?
It may be that the majority of the victims of hateful mapping may easily recover through therapy, but a few, perhaps the young, may be permanent victims.
- Flux - A Strategy Guide for OCD.
- Feasting on the Word: Year C, Volume 3: Pentecost and Season after Pentecost 1 (Propers 3-16)!
- Scream: A Novel.
- Evolution and Empathy – McFarland?
- Empathy vs Survival of the fittest!
Another question to ask is whether some of the victims, say in a group, may have had an EC disorder beforehand, and the mapping only reinforced ECD behaviors. When looking at issues like this, one most look to see of others have drawn conclusions, conclusions of the type that may not be normally documented, such as "street use" of mapping, which results in epidemic misinformation, and hence a potential collapse of the Information Society in poor cultures. Is there a presumption that hateful mapping may be a cause of hate by people who utilize such mapping, such as Goleman's security guard, and may this presumption be total misinformation that may ultimately result in a rebellion against the hate.
The key word here is "rebellion," which, on the societal level is revolution and on the psychological level is a reaction to extreme frustration, many result in dangerously expedient actions. Certainly rebellion is necessary to end the extreme hate of, say, pogrom or slavery, and possibly even the milder variety of human control that is common to most societies. The real question for humanity is how to channel change so that the same types of hateful "assholes" don't wind up in power again.
Using Russia as an example, the Czars' system was incredibly unjust easily seen in its method of disease control was human extermination. But what replaced it through exceedingly violent means resulted in forms of collectivism that killed tens of millions with starvation, and eventually Stalin-ism, which ultimately caused the solution to become as hateful, or more hateful, than the initial problem, which was ECD within the royal system. As I began to construct this model, experiences that contributed to the ideas of the model directly contradicted the premises of empathy, especially as it defines compassion.
The most surprising learning was that the action group on Care2. More surprising was the confidence with which many of these "sufferers" installed themselves as group leaders, even so much as to offer therapeutic services online as group moderators. In private email conversation, the first to step forward admitted to recently having a intimate relationship in which he admittedly destroyed the self-esteem of his partner, and the second, in phone conversation, became verbally abusive. The empathy action research group was a apparently a magnet for people incapable of empathy!
The first confirmed he had aspergers syndrome which is the obvious anti-empathic disorder as the disease defines missing empathic constructs , and the second confirmed she is bipolar the first anti-empathic disorder I investigated in the person of an abusive manager in the often lethal concrete business. As I organized the group, and did what I call the simple math--that is, assume that the cruelty problem of the World stems from lacking empathy, and hence defective empathic neurons of aspergers--the first person I mentioned above became very hostile, and asked me if "I knew anyone with aspergers," implying that I am biased against aspergers sufferers.
He left the group as he admitted his condition, and then I received anonymous threats that I assumed came from him. While I believe that bipolar disorder has initiated most of the external stresses in my life, aspergers is the classic anti-empathic disorder, and is the focus to the autism "spectrum" disorder. As I was forming these ideas, the "Virginia Tech" killings took place where a very sick man launched a military attack on his fellow students. What was interesting is that the man's relatives stated that he had no affection for his mother as a child, saying he was autistic.
He was also psychotic, but the important issue to me was that he had a disease that prevented him from having feelings for the effects he has on others, and hence allowed him to do the killings. This for me created a single secnario for all the misdeeds of humanity, and I brought the issue to an Internet forum on autism, as I was still a little misinformed as to labels.
Parents of the autistic on that forum straightened me out, while others on the forum attempted increase the misinformation especially with respect to this mass-killing incident. Technically, I suppose, the killer would be said to have aspergers, but with new knowledge brought, or forced, by the discoveries of specifically empathic neurons in higher species, I think that this label is obsolete, especially when discussed as one of the "spectrum" disorders.
The killer simply lacked empathy, as do most people guilty of heinous acts: Psychology implies with the phrase "emotional problems" that malignant emotions cause people to do bad things, or as psychologists may say "act out with bad behaviors. Going further, people who do bad things, in either overt or devious ways to hurt others, are victimizers, and are in fact the cause of many, if not most, of the problems that otherwise normal people would not have, such as the trauma of terror.
So long as people with empathic dysfunction are "high functioning," it does not matter to psychologists what their effects on others are, so long as they don't get arrested. But then many within legal enforcement and judicial systems are likewise "cold," and find it easy to bring pain and suffering to others presumably because they themselves do not have the emotional communication constructs to feel the pain of others.
Toward a More Selfish Gene. Kirschner medieval metaphor methylation modern synthesis mutation natural selection norepinephrine objects Odovacar Origins of Virtue painting percent perhaps phenotype physiology poetry populations pre-Greek processes proteins psychologists reactive relationships Renaissance result Ridley right brain right hemisphere role Roman says scientists seems seen selfish gene shown species sympathetic nervous system temperament term tion traits tribes viewer West-Eberhard.
Evolution and Empathy: The Genetic Factor in the Rise of Humanism
Brener has written books and numerous articles on such topics as art, opera and Judaica. These two periods were remarkable in part because of the dominance of empathy and humanism in the philosophical thought of each era"--Provided by publisher. Contents Machine derived contents note: Notes Includes bibliographical references p. View online Borrow Buy Freely available Show 0 more links Related resource Table of contents only at http: Set up My libraries How do I set up "My libraries"?
These 2 locations in All: University of Queensland Library. Open to the public ; GN Open to the public. This single location in New South Wales: This single location in Queensland:
Related Evolution and Empathy: The Genetic Factor in the Rise of Humanism
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved