Penn sometimes overplays his material, ominously building up events which turn out not to be that dramatic after all. That's obviously fine in speech, but it meant I had to reread a few of the sentences in here to work out what was exactly was happening. Penn is strong on writing paragraph-sketches of key figures in the regime, but he has an annoying habit of including so many of them that it becomes a demanding job to keep track of them all.
Names are scattered around like confetti. It was very probably the Hertfordshire knight Sir William Say — who as well as being an acquaintance of Archbishop Morton and More's father Sir John, was Mountjoy's father-in-law — who had provided the young More with an introduction to Mountjoy, with whom he became firm friends.
The Say family, indeed, joined all the dots: Sir William was half-brother to Elizabeth countess of Surrey, and among the queen's gentlewomen was his sister, Anne. This is fine at the start of a book, but when he was still introducing dozens of characters by page I started to get a bit annoyed with it.
Most are introduced and then dropped two pages later, never to reappear. The most fascinating parts for me turned out to be the sidebars on 16th-century Europe — the international trade in alum, monopolised by the Pope, smuggled across the continent by Henry, was something I knew nothing about.
England's enclave in Calais is also something I'd like to read more on. Financial affairs in particular are very well handled here, and in Penn's retelling at least they were one of Henry's central preoccupations. But overall and clearly I'm in a minority, since most people seem to have loved this book I just felt there was a lack of narrative coherence. View all 4 comments. Shakespeare Lied 1 August Everywhere where this book is concerned there are statements about how it won all these awards, and how wonderful it is as a history book, yet I found it on the clearance table at a bookshop I was exploring in inner city Sydney.
Normally I wouldn't have purchased it, but it grabbed my attention, and a part of me actually thought it was about Richard III. Actually, maybe I bought it because it was about Henry VII and then promptly forgot, but I do know that I didn't Shakespeare Lied 1 August Everywhere where this book is concerned there are statements about how it won all these awards, and how wonderful it is as a history book, yet I found it on the clearance table at a bookshop I was exploring in inner city Sydney. Actually, maybe I bought it because it was about Henry VII and then promptly forgot, but I do know that I didn't buy it because it won all these awards namely because I generally don't buy books simply because they have won awards and I certainly don't vote in the Goodreads choice awards, namely because I rarely, if ever, read contemporary literature.
Penn suggests that this has something to do with his character, but seriously, how could you consider Henry's character to be quite bad when you put him up against Shakespeare's version of Richard III — seriously, if there was one king that should have been forgotten it should have been Richard, expect we have a play, and quite a famous saying attributed to him which no doubt he never actually said.
This is the thing with Shakespeare, the first thing that I picked up when I was reading this book was how propaganderous Richard III actually is — when we read the play, or even watch it, we get the impression that Richard was a thug that had a very tenuous grip on power, and by the time Bodsworth Field came about it was an open and shut battle that Henry easily won.
Well, nothing could be further from the truth, and the fact that Henry actually won had more to do with luck as opposed to any failing on Richard's part. As for being a tyrant, well, Henry was actually no better than Richard, though since he was the victor, Shakespeare obviously was influenced by the fact that the Tudor's won the battle. The period of Henry VII was a period where England was in transition — going from a medieval past into a modern future. In one sense he brought stability to the kingdom, which was a kingdom that had been torn apart by wars ever since the English were kicked out of France.
Yet under Richard England was also going through a period of stability, and Henry simply was able to marshal the troops, with French backing, to remove Richard and install himself as an usurper. One interesting thing that I learnt was that one of the two boys that were allegedly murdered in the tower was said to have actually been living in Scotland, and every so often somebody would claim to be the prince and seek to take the throne off of Henry for himself. However, one of the first things that Henry did was make sure that people considered him to be a legitimate heir his claim was actually quite tenuous , and having some guy appear and claim to be the lost prince had the potential to undermine his authority.
In fact, for the first few years of his reign he found himself having to fight off other claimant's to the throne, or simply those who were still bitter than he had ousted Richard. In a way what we have here is the beginnings of Renaissance England. At the start of Henry's reign there was still quite a large belief in the existence of King Arthur — in fact in this period and earlier the kings would claim their legitimacy by claiming to be descendant's of Arthur well, not William the Conqueror, but you get the picture.
Henry even went as far as naming his first born son Arthur, though his son ended up dying before he could take the crown, which meant that so far there hasn't actually been an actual 'King Arthur' on the throne ignoring, of course, the wonderful story that appears in Monmoth, though it also seems that the search for Arthur is almost as futile as the search for the mythical holy grail. Yet, by the end of this period we discover that the whole King Arthur story has been put to bed, with the publication of the Anglica Historia though not without some controversy.
Another thing we find out is that Henry wasn't actually a good king — he was an extravagant one, and in many cases was like that person that goes out to make a heap of money to basically live an outrageous and extravagant lifestyle, and spending all the money that goes with such a lifestyle. As such Henry was always looking for new and inventive ways of attempting to extort money of out his subjects. In fact, confiscating property, and titles, was one of his favourite ways of deal with enemies.
However, his properties, his lavish weddings, and the fact that he lived extravagantly, demonstrated that he wasn't a king that was interested in the people, but just another tyrant wanting to live in luxury though he was also an expert at hiding his wealth, but like a lot of people that we know about today. I probably should finish off by saying a few things about the book. Basically it is one of those books that you would probably use if you happened to be writing a history essay on the period, or that you are really, really interested in the intricate historical details of a time period, or a person.
Frequently bought together
There is actually quite a lot of interesting things in here, but it is really only something for the avid reader. Okay, I love my history, and I love reading history books, but sometime the details does cause me to bog down a bit, or to skim and scan. This book didn't really grab my attention as some have managed to do. The other thing is that it made me realise how difficult going through the sources would have been. Penn suggests that one of the reasons that we have the sources is that one of Henry's enemies escaped to France with them before they could be destroyed.
When I studied history we were expected to go to primary sources, such as diaries and such — simply going to secondary sources, such as this book, really wasn't all that acceptable.
Winter King: The Dawn of Tudor England by Thomas Penn – review
Hey, even using Shakespeare as a source for Henry V wasn't acceptable, at least to my history lecturer. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. View all 11 comments. Apr 07, Marie Z. Johansen rated it it was amazing. I have to admit to being a history geek. For me, history is alive and energizing - not something static and remote. My obsession is European history from the 12th through 17th centuries - especially British history - so of course, when I was offered the chance to review this book, my interest was piqued immediately.
I had not read too terribly much about Henry VII in the past and, with this book, Thomas Penn, brings this most important of English monarch to life in a very enjoyable fashion.
- Winter King: Henry VII and the Dawn of Tudor England by Thomas Penn.
- Henry VII and the Dawn of Tudor England.
- Notes on the blog and book reviews;
- Related reviews;
There I have to admit to being a history geek. There is nothing pedantry about this book. It is detailed to be sure but the details add to the read - they don't detract from the flow of the book as can become an issue with some dry historical missives. This book is lively, enthralling, detailed and enjoyable! Mentally agile, intelligent, ruthless, thoughtful and canny, Henry VII is an engrossing historical character and this book is a winner! I heartily recommend it for other history obsessives or Tudor fans. Thomas Penn's Winter King is not really a biography of Henry VII, and more a study of what he was directing his government to do in his name.
We certainly can, and do, decide what sort of king Henry was based on what he had his government get up to, however. For a further review: View all 9 comments. There are an awful lot of books written about the Tudor era, both fiction and non-fiction, so you have to ask whether this book adds anything new. I am glad to say that I think it does, for it concentrates on the reign, and court, of Henry VII, giving a different slant to the well known story.
Henry VII ruled from and had a dubious claim on the throne, spending most of his time before the famous Battle of Bosworth Field in exile and gaining credibility from his marriage to Elizabeth of There are an awful lot of books written about the Tudor era, both fiction and non-fiction, so you have to ask whether this book adds anything new. Henry VII ruled from and had a dubious claim on the throne, spending most of his time before the famous Battle of Bosworth Field in exile and gaining credibility from his marriage to Elizabeth of York.
His early reign was plagued by pretenders to the throne, giving the new Tudor dynasty a rocky start and a fear of conspiracy which dogged Henry VII throughout his life.
Of course, we all know the history. Catherine's subsequent loss of status, the arguments with Ferdinand over her dowry, her uncertainty over her future and the papal dispensation over whether she remained a virgin and could marry Prince Henry worded in a rather vague way to please both parties, a fact which would come back to haunt Catherine in later years. The emergence of Henry, no longer the second son in terms of the 'heir and the spare', he was most certainly the 'spare' suddenly having to be given training in being a future king, when it was Arthur who had been initially given his own household while Henry had been brought up with his mother and siblings.
However, despite there being such a wealth of knowledge about this period, the author does a great job of bringing the court of Henry VII back to life.
Winter King: The Dawn of Tudor England | Reviews in History
He explains who had control of the finances and how their power was mis-used, the emergence of characters who assumed greater importance when Prince Henry became King and how the death of Henry VII and the transfer of power was managed. Henry VII was a wily ruler, who often mis-used power but was determined to create a new dynasty. When his death was not announced at first, so his ministers could manage the transfer of power to his son, Henry VIII, you feel he would have approved.
I really enjoyed this book, especially detail about lesser known members of the court. It was a very interesting read and I recommend it highly. View all 7 comments. Jan 15, K. Charles added it Shelves: Well written and really interesting about an often ignored king.
- Winter King: Henry VII and the Dawn of Tudor England: Thomas Penn: tevopaleqopi.tk: Books.
- Customers who viewed this item also viewed.
- Black Tide (Jack Irish Thriller Book 2).
I had an idea Henry VII was a force for stability; in fact he was a terrifying kleptocrat, abusing the law with arbitrary fines and imprisonment, scheming to effectively steal entire estates and wring every penny out of subjects as well as impose political control through financial means. The parts on how he abused his position and the law to enrich himself while an entire nation watched helplessly are, frankly, This was excellent. The parts on how he abused his position and the law to enrich himself while an entire nation watched helplessly are, frankly, pretty relevant to now.
Once people had been informed against to the king and his counsellors, they had stepped outside a world governed by recognised judicial processes into one of nightmarish contingency, from which there was no escape: Sep 14, happy rated it really liked it Shelves: Interesting look at the founder of the Tudor dynesty. I thought the book was well written, even though a bit dry is spots. Henry was a remarkable man. I thought the way he controled the nobility was fascinating - keeping them in check as well a raising vast sums of money at the same time.
The book brings out his successful diplomacy - keeping England out of the various wars in Europe and managing to marry his son to the daughter of one of leading houses in Europe. I thought the look at his relatio Interesting look at the founder of the Tudor dynesty. I thought the look at his relationship with his queen was interesting.
He obviously married her for political reasons, but there seems to have been a deep emotional attachment to her. After her death he was devestated. Penn theorizes she was the main person who brought him out of his grief after the death of his heir. If Penn's portrayal of Henry is anywhere close to accurate, he was a much, much better king than his son and a much better human being. Well worth the read. Aug 18, John Wiltshire added it Shelves: I'm not giving this a star rating because I suspect it's me at fault not the book. I couldn't even stay awake reading this.
Seriously, got nudged by my partner when I'd nodded off. Wolf Hall this is not. Wow, it was like being battered by facts without remission for good intentions. Feb 21, Claire Ridgway rated it it was amazing. Taken from my full review at http: I just wanted to clear that up before I launch into my review. Henry VII was born in and ruled England from to , but this book opens in autumn and so does not give you all the details of Henry's early life, his rise, his claim to the throne etc. That surprised me and actually disappointed me because I wanted the whole caboodle, Henry's whole life in detail.
However, I wasn't disappointed when I started reading because Penn's book is, as historian Helen Castor described, "a masterpiece". I would describe it as a narrative, rather than a biography. I came away thinking what a miserly and boring king he was and that stuck with me. Thomas Penn's book changed that perception though. The Henry VII of Winter King is far from boring and it's easy to see where Henry VIII got his ruthless streak from when you meet Penn's paranoid Machiavellian ruler who seemed to rule with a rod of iron and wanted to be feared, rather than loved, by his subjects.
You can hardly blame the man when he was seen as a usurper and had to deal with so many challenges to his authority. But when the dark powers seize his sister, the Dark Lord's thralls call him the chosen one Sergeant Edwin Barnes leads veterans of Britain's imperial wars in search of soldiering work The 7th Wife of Henry the 8th: Part one of the Tudor romance saga.
The Princes in the Tower: Was Richard III a ruthless killer who murdered his nephews to take the throne? Or was someone else responsible for the deaths of the child princes? Page 1 of 1 Start Over Page 1 of 1. The Dawn of Tudor England. The video content is inappropriate. The video content is misleading. The ad is too long.
The ad does not play. The ad does not inform my purchase. The video does not play. There is too much buffering. The audio is poor or missing. Video is unrelated to the product. Please fill out the copyright form to register a complaint. Legendary Queen Of England. When Elizabeth I took the throne of Englan, hardly anyone knew what to make of her. Born the heir to the throne her rule was a fascinating one. The Man With Two Names: Quintus Sertorius was once considered Rome's greatest hero. Now, he is considered her most dangerous enemy.
Page-turning tales of lust, sorcery and power steeped in Welsh legend and set in post-Roman Britain. Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a customer review. Read reviews that mention viii reign penn catherine roses throne aragon thomas period biography english dynasty tudors elizabeth richard iii arthur detail bosworth became. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I cannot say enough good about this book about Henry VII. Penn did a fabulous job peeling away the layers of Henry VII. I have not found any other book that compares when it comes to looking at Henry's life and times. I enjoyed the fact that Mr. Penn gave Henry his due and didn't just scorn him based on today's standards and moral code. Henry was obviously not an easy going King but he did help bring England together and let it heal from the War of the Roses.
He was a very smart and shrewd man. By today's standards he may seem cruel and cold but he was a product of his time and of the life he was forced to lead as a possible claimant to the throne. I would highly recommend, and often do, this book to anyone interested in the life of Henry VII! Perhaps it's because I recently finished a fascinating biography on Edward I by Marc Morris, but I found this book to be an exhaustively boring read.
First off, the author's writing style is somewhat difficult to follow; especially if English is not your native tongue. Beginning 12 years into the reign of Henry VII, the author uses comma after comma in these long-winded sentences to describe the most trivial of things.
I'm no grammar expert and I'm sure that an editor deemed this to be the best style of writing for the topic at hand, but I often found myself having to reread sections in order to follow Penn's train of thought. Additionally, the book time jumps a lot. Some people probably won't mind this, but it's just my preference for historical biographies to be written chronologically.
For me, chronological order makes it easier to understand and retain information. Unfortunately, this book is just all over the place. I also found it disappointing that this book began so late in Henry VII's reign as opposed to the days after the Battle of Bosworth. This was probably the most pivotal battle in English medieval history so it would be interesting to know what happened in the days after that.
Did he just call a Parliament and get to work? Penn is masterful in setting the scene here. He tells us about the men Henry relied on. He talks about secret plots and behind the scenes diplomatic maneuvers. He gives us great insight into the personality of Henry and what his motives were. For me, the best chapters are in the last third of the book.
After the death of Arthur and Elizabeth, King Henry brings Prince Henry to court to give him every advantage and to make clear the hopes of the dynasty rested on his shoulders. The education of Prince Henry as well as a great awareness of how he spent his leisure time is recounted. Prince Henry was closely guarded by his father and not allowed much leeway in his behavior. But the descriptions of him and his pals and their military training and jousting antics are really fun to read about.
I found that reading S. For me the book seemed to start off a little slow, however it certainly picks up after a few chapters and begins to read more like an enjoyable historical fiction book. Having been a student of the life of Henry Tudor, for over 30 years, I heartily endorse the above book-review. I bought the book shortly after Publication Date. Compared to all the previous attempts to write about both the Man and the King, Thomas Penn and his research team have managed to find a great deal of detailed material from British and French sources which has never been published previously.
Related Winter King: The Dawn of Tudor England
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved